Global Reporters Vienna
![]() |
| Dr. Sam Amadi |
Text
of lecture delivered at the 2012 International Youth Day Lecture organised by
the African Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL) to mark the
2012 International Youth Day, Abuja, Wednesday, August 8, 2012
This is probably the most
distressing time to be a youth in Nigeria. It is also probably the most
interesting time to be a youth in Nigeria. To paraphrase Charles Dickens, this
is the best of times and the worst of times. Insecurity, poverty and
hopelessness stalk the landscape. At the same time, hope, opportunity and
prosperity beckons. The pessimists will argue that things are so bad that they
will get worse. Nigeria is going to hell, he will conclude. The optimists will
say that things are so bad that they will only get better. Nigeria is breaking
through he will conclude. Is Nigeria going to hell or breaking through? I will
like to invite the Nigerian youth to be pragmatic optimists. I believe we are
at the cusp of a great thing. Something is about to be birthed. We are going
through the excruciating birth pangs. But we can go past the birth-stool or
have a still-birth. It all depends. And what it depends on will be the gist of
this conversation.
What the Heck about Youths?
I want to talk about the
importance of young people and what Nigeria should do to make the best use of
its young people. Why would anyone care so much about young people? From a
public policy perspective young people are the engine of economic growth since
they constitute largely the workforce and the consuming class in an economy.
The productivity of labor and the quality of consumer demand are the two
critical drivers of economic growth from the supply and demand sides. Countries
with aging population worry about their ability to sustain their economic
growth on account of their aging population. A highly skilled youth population
enhances the global competitiveness of the economy by boosting gross domestic
product. The youths are also the highest consumers of goods and services, and
therefore investment boosters.
There are also socio-political
reasons why we value the youth. Young people, through their liberalism,
dynamism and idealism reinvigorate and sometimes reinvent institutions of the
state. Their activism helps the states to overcome the pathologies of
entrenched institutions and ginger political leaders to establish new
institutions that respond to fresh challenges. The liberalism and dynamism of
youth is the reason why the face of the change in the world today is youth.
Young people are on the blocks deciding the destiny of the human race. It is
arguable that at no time in the past have we seen a greater degree of youth
activism in different aspects of life than this moment. Young people are to be empowered.
We owe this empowerment much to technology. The technological revolution
brokered by the digital computer, the internet, the broadband and the mobile
telephony system have changed the way we live, think and talk. With the
innovation of facebook and twitter we have fully unleashed the power of youth.
We have altered the power equation in the remaking of the world.
The world has gone digital,
reducing drastically the cost of communication and abridging vistas and making
instantaneity the essence of globalism. We are now in the real global village.
Life now fully resembles art. The transformation of the world through new
technologies has implications for power and politics. The new media, riding on
the back of new technologies, reconstitutes the landscape of power relations
intra and inter polity. It has also restructured the dialectics of power
relations, privileging those who control the means of modern communication and
dissolving the hierarchies that define who gets what, how and when. If politics
is the art of the possible, it is those who control today’s means of
communication that define what is possible. Young people have inserted
themselves at the control room of social change by hugging the new tools of
communication.
In a way, young people are the
new masters of the universe. From the United States to Europe and the Middle
East we see young people on the streets negotiating the nature of the world
they live in. The emergence of a 40-something old man as the leader of the
British Labour Party is evidence that young people are not just reshaping the
world from the street. They have inserted themselves in the cockpit of
statecraft. But the most interesting phenomenon in the remaking of the world is
how young people are using new technologies to reshape the ethical and
political contours of globalism. The collapse of corrupt autocracies in what is
now memorialized as the ‘Arab Spring’ signifies how the combination of youthful
vigor and smart technology extends the possibilities of establishing democracy.
The young activists in Arab streets fought to establish democracy while their
counterparts on Wall Street fought to reinvent a fading democracy. These
momentous events tell a lot about young people. Young people are important
because they have the potentials to help us chart new ways out of the several
incubuses we are trapped.
Down home in Nigeria, can we
hope that young people can foster a new debate and invigorate politics in a way
that leads to true transformation? Are we hopeful of our home-made ‘Arab
Spring’ and can young men or women emerged in the presidential villa and
gubernatorial mansions in Nigeria to reset the institutions of governance so
they produce wealth and happiness for the citizens of Nigeria? Can we the young
people of Nigeria dream new dreams about a country founded on the simple thesis
of citizen rights and make that dream happen? I think there is reason to
believe that the young people in Nigeria can rise to the game.
Nigerian youths constitute at
least 65 percent of the estimated 165 million citizens of Nigeria. We are a
very reproductive country. And because mortality rate is very high our
population will remain largely young for a long while. So, a robust and
meaningful youth policy should be a strategic anchor of a sustainable agenda
for transformation.
What should be Nigeria’s
Youth Policy?
If young people are critical
resources for economic and social transformation we need to think clearly how
we can better husband these resources. We need to know the challenges and
opportunities young people face and design policies and programs that address
these challenges and opportunities. Maximizing the potentials of young people
to improve themselves and improve their environment should be the focus of a
national youth policy. Here, I don’t intend to examine Nigeria’s national youth
policy document. I will simply outline what the challenges I think the young
people in Nigeria face and paint broad strokes of the initiatives that can
address those challenges.
It seems clear to me that the
first challenge of young people in Nigeria today is survival, I mean physical
survival. Young people want to be alive. This is not pedestrian considering how
cheap life has become in Boko Haram Nigeria. Many young people on national
service to their fatherland have been killed in the coldest of blood. Because
young people are more mobile and egregious they are mostly the victims of the
repeated bombing of churches and public places by Boko Haram terrorists.
Young people are afraid to live
in the Nigerian state. Human beings are territorial. And once we have exited
the state of nature someone should be responsible to guarantee our physical
life. It is the Nigerian state. It is that entity that possesses the exclusive
use of legitimate force that should protect the life every Nigerian youth. So,
the Nigerian youths expect the Nigerian state to fight hard to make sure no
young person is killed by a miscreant or a misguided religionist.
If you cannot guarantee life to
Nigerian youths, you cannot guarantee human dignity and social welfare. The
Nigerian youth needs to be safe and secure in a territory called Nigeria before
they can dream great dreams and think creatively. It was Hannah Arendt, the
Jewish American philosopher, who alerted the world to the reality that human
rights only make sense within a right-based political state. If people don’t
have a secured territory and enjoy the rights of a citizen it makes little
sense to speak about human rights.
So, the Nigerian youth needs
assurance that he can wake up and go about his business without undue fear of
loss of life. In present times this assurance should not be taken for granted.
President Jonathan is right to note that insecurity in Nigeria is grinding
governance. The first imperative of a national youth policy should be that we
do everything to secure a social space where the Nigerian youth wakes up in the
morning, goes to work and return home safe to have fun with family and friends.
That is not too much to ask. But today, that is becoming a luxury.
The Nigerian state must rise up
the challenge of terrorism and indiscriminate killing of Nigerian citizens. We
should end the impunity that fuels the urge to kill the other person in wonton
pursuit of crazy ideas and beliefs. As a matter of urgency, a law derived from
the constitutional provision of citizenship should put it beyond doubt that
every Nigerian who has lived in any part of Nigeria to a reasonable period of
time and pay his taxes has the full rights of any other Nigerian in that part
of the country irrespective of ethnic or religious identity. The Nigerian
government should affirm, backed with actions, the simple thesis of a modern
state: that every citizen has a right of complete safety and freedom everywhere
in Nigeria. The Nigerian government should invoke its force of arm to hunt down
any person who kills any other Nigerian anywhere in Nigerian in the pretext of
religion.
We have to unashamedly declare
that the religion of the Nigerian state is the protection of the life of every
Nigerian everywhere in Nigeria. This is not a matter of pious declaration.
Executive orders should be issued to all the law enforcement agencies to always
do everything necessary (sparing no cost) to make sure no Nigerian youth is a
victim of extra-judicial killing by a law enforcement agent or self-appointed
ethical or religious enforcer.
The other component of security
is social. Young people want to be delivered from fear of untimely and brutal
death. But they also desire freedom from fear of want. The great American president,
Theodore Roosevelt talked about the four freedoms, including freedom from fear
and want. Very needy people are rarely free. Roosevelt’s vision of a world
without hunger and misery has crystallized into international recognition for
social and economic rights of all persons. The Nigerian constitution
recognizes the right of every citizen to a life of dignity, defined as equal
access to the social and economic amenities of life. It provides fundamental
conditions of economic welfare for Nigerian citizens under the rubric of
directive principles of state policy. Although lawyers generally perceive these
principles as unenforceable by courts of law they are commitments that should
be rigorously pursued in social and economic policymaking.
The shorthand for these rights
is the MDGs. The global MDG movement is becoming something that many people are
beginning to think could be a scam because their fanfare produces little
visible results. A lot of financial resources are wasted in the promotion of
MDG yet few countries have significantly released millions from poverty. And
the one or two who have done so were not enamored with MDGs rhetoric. The
fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy in Chapter 2 of
the constitution is prior and more sensible than the MDGs. It really provides
directive logic for governance in a developing country. If we consciously
dedicate governance to catering to the human and social security of young
Nigerians, we will achieve the MDGs without making a carnival of them.
A starting point in providing a
future of wellbeing for the Nigerian youth would be to constitutionally mandate
these rights in a language that obligates courts and other public institutions
to promote and enforce them. In this we can learn something from South Africa
that made these rights enforceable in its post-Apartheid constitution.
The widespread unemployment of
Nigerian youths should be seen as an affront to the notion of socially secured
Nigerian youth which Chapter two of the constitution guarantees. There are many
reasons unemployment rate is high in Nigeria. But if we care about young people
we have to tackle unemployment with care, courage and competence. Providing
meaningful work to young people is one way of enhancing their life-skills and
weaning them away from the life of drudgery and crime. The old saying remains
true: an idle mind is a devil’s workshop.
The present initiative on job
creation and entrepreneurship, YouWIN, is a good start. But a lot should be
done. For one, it is not just the federal government that should be serious
about youth employment and entrepreneurship. The states should be the main
drivers of youth employment since they have the primary responsibility of
promoting the welfare of residents of their territories. Few states, if any,
have a well considered and strategic initiative on job creation and youth
entrepreneurship beyond procurement-focused public works. The federal
government can incentivize states on job creation by creating programs that
predicate significant financial grants on the basis of well considered and
implementable entrepreneurship and job creation program.
A good strategy to create jobs
should be anchored on a smart entrepreneurship development program. It is
obvious that our over-bloated public service cannot provide good paying jobs to
satisfy the ever-increasing army of job-seekers. The private sector is
underdeveloped to create the desired thousands of jobs without far-reaching
transformative economic policies. Job creation strategy should focus more on
turning job-seekers to job creators. This is no mean feat. It requires
unleashing the creativity of the Nigerian youth. We can see evidence of
incipient creativity in the quality of art, music and video that come out of
the Nigerian market. What is wanted is a systematic and value-chain initiative
that discovers, nurtures, harnesses and commercializes the creative energies of
young people.
May be there should be a
ministry focusing on job creation and entrepreneurship. We can be like smart
countries of the world that create ministries to reflect the challenges and
priorities they face. If we cannot create a new ministry we can restructure and
rename the present Ministry of Youth Development to focus on job creation and
youth entrepreneurship. This requires wholesale change of the mission and human
resources of that ministry. Starting from the Minister, everybody there should
be someone who understands the policy dimensions of job creation and
entrepreneurship. The ministry’s work will be to develop policies on youth
entrepreneurship; organize boot-camps, spot talents, incubate them and link
them with resources and markets that help them to become business owners.
Between the creative idea and its commercialization lies a chasm that only wise
grandfathering can abridge. The ministry should grandfather the creative genius
of Nigerian youth.
The new Ministry (restyled
Ministry of Youth Entrepreneurship) will also have the responsibility of
annexing industries to youth skills development. This requires that instead of
public sectors training youth for various skills without caring about what the
market wants, the ministry will ensure that skills acquisition programs are
comprehensively annexed to specific industries that will absolve such skills to
ensure that the skills are those that the industries need and can remunerate.
The private sector is not left
out of this. In modern economy the private sector is the creator of jobs.
Federal government’s job creation strategies should include providing incentives
in the form tax relief and other fiscal incentives to companies that create
jobs and provide opportunities for youth entrepreneurship and mentoring. We
need to send a consistent and strong message that government rewards value
creation by the private sector. Presently, private sector is getting the
message that it pays to free-ride on public funds. Government should adopt
carrot and stick measures to wean the private sector from food-is-ready
relationship with the public sector and burden them with responsibility of
supporting national development.
The prospect of job creation and
youth entrepreneurship is dependent on the quality of education in a country.
There are many stages of economic development, the extractive, industrial and
innovative stages. Nigeria is still trapped in the extractive stage. And worse,
we are not effectively investing the proceeds of natural resources extraction
on drivers of economic and social development. The history of economic
development in the world concludes that reliance on extraction of natural
resource will not launch any country into the orbit of developed economies.
This is for many reasons, including the reason that natural resources wealth
induces to waste and perverse incentives that nib away the incentive and value
of creative work that produces real and sustainable wealth. Natural resources
dependency comes with rent-seeking that destroys the commitment to value
creation. Economic development is about multiple value creation.
It is largely the prevalence of
some kinds of skills that determine whether a country is largely extractive,
industrial or innovative. At the innovative stage of economic development, a
country has the high-end digital and analytical skills that lead to creation of
innovative products and services. This is a product of the education of young
people, both formal and informal. Youth entrepreneurship in Nigeria is
dependent on the quality of education in Nigeria.
I don’t want to waste much time
on the collapse of education in Nigeria. It is now folklore. But I need to say
that the real cause and character of this failure may miss out in the
widespread tale about failure of education in Nigeria. It is not just
infrastructure and morale of teachers that have collapsed. The value system
that sustains education has collapsed. The failure of education and the failure
of the Nigerian state can correlate in many ways. Just as military dictatorship
put the Nigerian state in reverse, as Afrobeat King, Fela, put it, the military
also reversed the ethical framework of education. First, by discounting the
value of education in attaining important economic and political high offices,
the military put a knife at the heart of the education system. By creating a
system where people attain great wealth without valuable work, the military
ridiculed for ever the culture of hard work. Even admission to elite schools
was no longer the result of any mental exertion but the reward of inordinate
exercise of power.
When the she-goat is chewing
curds the kids watch keenly. The Nigerian parents have eaten sour grapes and
the youths have aching teeth. The Nigerian youth have learnt that knowledge and
learning are not valuable in Nigeria. They have learnt that sitting down and
sweating out a valuable creation is not the way to make it big in Nigeria. They
witness everywhere funerals of honesty and hard work to know it is not the way
to thrive in Nigeria. The high level political corruption and the high honors
that have been awarded to charlatans and fraudsters etch indelibly in the consciousness
of young Nigeria about what their country values.
Therefore, arresting the
collapse of the education is less about rebuilding the physical infrastructure
and more about rebuilding the ethical landscape of the education system.
Educational institutions, especially universities, should be urgently delivered
from the culture of mediocrity, immorality and nepotism that saturate them. The
worship of ill-gotten wealth and immoral power by universities in Nigeria
destroys the idea of a university as a creator of knowledge and the custodian
of values in a society. The National University Commission (NUC) may be right
to close down unaccredited universities. But I hope someone is accrediting the
moral strength of Nigerian university and will soon wield the hammer.
The reform of education system
has become pressing in order to enhance the global competitiveness of Nigerian
youths. This is tied to the idea of job creation. The Nigerian youth is caught
in a vicious fight for survival in a world that, in the world of Thomas
Friedman, is becoming increasingly flat. The world is flat because of changes
in technology has changed the way business is managed. A business in London or
New York may have its critical operations executed somewhere in Accra or
Bangalore. The outsourcing and off-shoring of jobs are possible because with
new technology the idea of business has been significantly altered.
In this new world there will be
winners and losers. Winners will be those who have the skills to play in the
new order. Losers will be those who don’t have such skills. The strategic
policy of every government that wants its youths to excel in the new world is
to provide opportunity for them to acquire the skills that will allow them to
win the competition with the best anywhere in the world.
This raises question about
education reform. What should be the goal of public education in Nigeria? From
this perspective, it should be to educate citizens who have the skills to
attract high-paying jobs anywhere in the world. This means that the curriculum
for our schools should be reviewed to align up with the character of the
emerging world. If we continue to teach our youths the skills of the old world
then we are disabling them from competing and winning in the new world.
Our education is not working.
The victims of its malfunction are young people who cannot get the best jobs.
It is no longer secret that some Nigerian companies prefer to employ from
neighboring countries in the stead of Nigerian because they lack confidence in
the quality of education. A former Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria once
argued that many Nigerian youths are unemployable. The problem of education is
not just what we think it is. It is not just about infrastructure and funding.
It is also about ethics. The most performing countries in public education are
also those who have mainstreamed the ethics of excellence in public education.
With the collapse of ethics in Nigeria, dating from the ruinous era of military
generals in government, our education sector is a place where the ‘worst are
full of intensity’ and character and competent are devalued, just like our
politics. If certificates and diploma are buyable what remains of public
education? How will the products of such an institution cherish the fundament
idea that it is work that produces wealth and prestige? And if we destroy that
simple certainty how will our youth prevail in the world of high skill and hard
work?
So, what should be done about
education in Nigeria for the sake of young people? First, government should
prioritize education as the springboard of economic and social development.
Yes, this translates to more funding for the education sector. But beyond
increasing funding government should increase accountability of resources in
the education system. Every Naira should count. Corrupt school administrators
should be severely punished. Incompetent school administrators should be
removed immediately even if they are indigenes of host communities. Teachers
should be paid well but also properly tested and retrained. Merit should be the
basis of admission into important institutions of learning, at least those
owned by the federal government. Curricula of institutions should be examined
to ensure compliance with the paradigm shifts in a digital age (we should no
longer graduate people who can neither attract good paying job or create one).
We should train against world standards because our youths will compete with
everyone everywhere in the world.
The Nigerian cities have a role
to play in nurturing ethics, creativity and entrepreneurship of the Nigerian
youths. Cities are now the sites for creating of wealth in today’s world. We
talk more of the global competitiveness of cities of the world. Cities are
branding themselves on account of the infrastructure they provide to nurture a
particular way of life that is desirable. Some cities are becoming tourist
attractions and huge entertainment centers; others are becoming coveted
conference centers of the world. Dubai is a huge shopping mall and now a sporting
arena. Boston/Cambridge is the human biology center of the world such that
countries are upgrading the consulates offices in Boston to stay close to
breakthroughs in human science from MIT and Harvard. Even Accra is becoming the
conference center of the West African sub-region.
Where does the Nigerian city
stand in providing the social amenities that promote a life of creativity and
entrepreneurship? Abuja, Nigeria’s star city does not boast the
minimalist infrastructure that caters to the social needs of young people.
There are no quality libraries and public internet kiosks where young people
can gather and socialize in a manner that engenders creativity and innovation.
Policies for urban renewal should not just be about demolition of homesteads of
the poor and the underprivileged. It should be more about constructing cities
that nurture creativity and entrepreneurship. Providing a good social-economic
base for human security requires in the minimum the promotion of an economic
system that provides quality opportunity for quality education and healthcare
for the young people.
We need to develop a new vision
of cities as incubator of innovations and drivers of entrepreneurship. May be a
credible award should be presented to the most innovative city in Nigeria based
on metric that show consistent effort to promote a creative and peaceful living
environment. I hope the Nduka Obiaeghana’s of Nigeria are listening.
Youths and Pathology of
Social Amnesia (Or How Can We Make Young People Read and Read the Right Stuff?)
If young people are those who
will make Nigeria work then they need to understand why their country is not
working. They need to know what ails Nigeria. As the venerable Chinua Achebe
wisely and pithily remarked, “there is nothing with the Nigerian character. The
problem with Nigeria is simply and squarely the failure of leadership”. Even
with such emphatic declaration, one still needs to know how this ‘failure of
leadership’ manifests in order to reverse this failure.
If I can take liberty to revise
Achebe, I will argue that the problem with Nigeria is not primarily the failure
of leadership, but the failure of memory and understanding. That is, the
failure of the would-be change-makers to understand the nature of the failure
of leadership. An Igbo proverb laments that when a man loses one eye and his
wife loses one year it amounts to one corpse. If the leadership is benighted
and its challenges have no idea of what is wrong, then salvation is far away.
What you don’t understand you cannot reverse.
The more disheartening and
enduring tragedy of the Nigerian state is that the Nigerian youths who
carry the hope of reversing the failure of the Nigerian state do not
familiarize themselves with the nature of the crisis that confront their state.
This is a shame. Even with the ubiquity of social media and social
communication, real social consciousness among Nigerian youths is non-existent.
True, this problem is not limited to young people (even Nigerian leaders, who
create the ugly these histories, do not understand what they have done because
they neither write nor read the account of politics). But because youth means
renewal the political amnesia of young people is a major hindrance to
transformation.
The problem of political amnesia
of Nigerian youth takes two visible forms. First, there is very little reading
beyond the paltry academic reading that goes on in the campus. Second, even
those who read rarely read treatises about politics in Nigeria. This goes to
the quality of political consciousness of citizens. How many Nigerian youth
will ever take the time to read a good book on Nigerian politics written by a
Nigerian author? Those who are visible on social media, how many of them are
consciously engaged in political discourse? Even such postings in facebook and
twitter how many of them are reasoned reflections of the existentialist
challenges of modern Nigeria? How many young bloggers are delving into history
to inform their today? If you ask me, there are less than countable.
I am haunted by the absurd logic
of how a people can change their circumstances if they don’t gain rich insight
into their predicament. A foreigner once said that Nigerians are largely an
indifferent people; in Hausa language, ‘Baakwomi’. It is not that Nigerians
don’t complain. They complain and criticize a lot. But they make no strenuous
effort to understand why they are suffering. No quality change happens if
people merely go through the motion. What connects us to our travails are
memory and understanding We just must remember our political history. But
memory is not enough. We must understand, as they say, where the rain started
to fall on us. And why it did.
The problem is that we have
neither memory nor good understanding of our politics. And this is not good for
redemption. Just take one example. Recently, students of the former University
of Lagos protested against the renaming of the university after Chief Moshood
Abiola, the winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election. Many of the
student and civil society activists urged government to give befitting
memorial. When I considered the matter further I wondered how many of those
protesters remember whatever June 12 represents in the struggle for democracy
in Nigeria. While we clamor for a befitting national recognition for June 12,
do we understand the story about how Nigeria’s presidential election results
were annulled by a military dictator and the role played by polarized political
class?
It is in consideration of the
necessity to connect memory, understanding and social discourse among Nigerian
youths that I have designed a project to donate book by Nigerian authors on
Nigerian politics to Nigerian university. The idea is to provide incentives for
Nigerian social activists and commentators to write about political development
in Nigeria so that there will be enough reading materials for those who seek to
understand the Nigerian situation.
It is good that Nigerian youths
are hot on the new media and social landscape. We have so many fashion shows
and beauty pageants. We need to unleash the soul of our youth. But we also need
to unleash their intellect, especially their political intellect. A good
society does not emerge from heaven prepaid. It does not spring up from
imagination and daydream. It is the work of men and women who pay keen
attention, think hard and creative and get to work in a smart way to create the
fruits of their imagination.
It is good that Nigerian youth
are foremost in Africa in internet and facebook usage. It is good that many of
our youth are twitter nerds. We may need them for our Arab Spring. It is also
good that many of them are reading up the Onitsha Market equivalent of
motivational and can-do books. All these activities hopefully prepare them to
do the main job cut out for them. That is to engage the Nigerian project with
courage and strength.
It is time to wake up and begin
to build. But the challenge is how to know what to build. What version of
Nigeria is not working? What version of Nigeria will work? As the late great
poet, Chris Okigbo, counseled, except by rooting no one can harvest yam. We
need to read our history to build a memory and an understanding for
transformative work. The real challenge of restoring the Nigerian hope begins
with Nigerian youths who are thoughtfully engaged in understanding and
transforming the Nigerian state.
It begins with memory and
understanding
Thank you
Dr. Amadi
is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory
Commission.

No comments:
Post a Comment
While we ask commentators to be civil, note that any comment displayed here is not the opinion of the Global Reporters Vienna